Our mission is to make computer science accessible to students, hobbyists, and the curious public. Our first interactive exhibit was commissioned by the Intel Museum in 2006. Now in the prototype stage is an exciting new 300x scale model for living rooms, classrooms, and museums alike.
Happy 45th Birthday 4004! Here's your debut in the November 15,1971 issue of Electronic News.
Want to see what we have inspired? Visit the Visual 6502 Project
Photography: Tim McNerney, 4004 masks: courtesy Intel, Schematics drawn by: Lajos Kintli and Fred Huettig
New and Improved! Lajos Kintli's Intel 4004 netlist/layout analyzer and animated logic simulator with complete MCS-4 masks and schematics (Zip, v2.0: updated 11/15/09)
Bill Kotaska's Busicom 141-PF replica: Photos, schematics, and narrative — (v2: Updated 11/18/08)
Updated Busicom 141-PF calculator software, fully commented and documented (Text, Updated 11/17/2009)
Tim McNerney's talk at 35th Anniversary event (13-Dec-2006)
(MP3, 20min 47sec, © 2006 Computer History Museum)
Transcript of talk
Where is the Intel 4004 35th anniversary exhibit?
Robert Noyce Building
2200 Mission College Blvd
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Are you looking for volunteers, interns, or collaborators?
Do you offer products or services?
Within the next few months we plan to offer limited edition, "glass printer" Busicom 141-PF replicas suitable for displaying in your home or office, and built using vintage 4004-family chips. These Intel chips are expensive and in short supply, but if there is sufficient interest in more affordable replicas built using modern chips yet still running the original Busicom software, we would be happy to oblige.
How can I contact you?
So who were those anonymous "digital archeologists" reported in the Slashdot article?
Is the Intel 4004 really the world's first microprocessor?
The 4004 was manufactured from 1971 to 1986, any idea why it lasted so long?
Where can I buy individual, vintage chips?
I bought a 4004 on eBay. Do you think it still works?
Team Personnel (in alphabetical order)
Allen E. Armstrong, mechanical engineering
Fred Huettig, netlist extraction software, electrical engineering, FPGA programming
- Lajos Kintli, reverse-engineering, software analysis, commenting, documentation
Tim McNerney, conceptual design, project leader, digital design
Barry Silverman, reverse-engineering, simulation software
Brian Silverman, reverse-engineering, simulation software
Collaborators and advisors
- Federico Faggin, CEO Foveon, 4004 chip designer
- Sellam Ismail, proprietor, Vintage Tech
- Tom Knight, MIT CSAIL, VLSI history expert
- Tracey Mazur, Curator, Intel Museum
- Dag Spicer, Curator, Computer History Museum
- Rachel Stewart, former Intel archivist
Christian Bassow, owner of a Busicom 141-PF, who kindly sent me photographs of the PCB.
- Karen Joyce, electronic assembler extraordinaire
- Matt McNerney, webmaster
Knowing that robotic "pick-and-place" machines were now the standard way of assembling electronics, and made the whole idea practical to produce, I started thinking. What could I build out of this "retro," one-gate-per-chip technology? Some sort of microprocessor seemed like a natural. But modern microprocessors have millions of transistors, so I knew I'd have to keep the project very modest, like restricting the data-path to 4-bits. This meant I'd have to design my own, or... go back in history and build a replica of a commercial micrprocessor. Besides, reproducing a commercial microprocessor, rather than re-inventing my own, would allow me to use existing software and existing manuals, data sheets, wisdom of the ages, etc.
The first microprocessor that came to mind was the Intel 4004. It was not nearly as famous as the 8080, and its 8-bit progeny, but my late step-father, Joe Robb, worked for Intel in the early 1970's, and I still remember when brought home some MCS-4 data sheets. MCS-4 (Microcomputer Set 4) was the name Intel gave to the 4004 chip family for its commercial introduction in November 1971.
In search of the circuit
During this research spree I also learned that the Intel Archives and the Intel Museum were somehow connected. This helped me turn a notion into a plan: I wrote to Tracey Mazur, the curator of the Intel Museum, and Rachel Stewart, Intel's corporate archivist, with a proposition: if you give me access to internal 4004 engineering documents, I will build you a giant, functioning replica of the 4004 suitable for a museum exhibit.
Around the same time I started looking for vintage software to run on the giant 4004 replica. I wrote to Federico Faggin and to Marcian "Ted" Hoff, two of the four co-inventors of the 4004 (I was never able to contact the other inventors, Busicom's Masatoshi Shima or Intel's Stan Mazor). Both Faggin and Hoff wrote back, Faggin with a general offer of advice, and Hoff with software for a 4004-based video game design that Intel pitched to a potential customer.
At this time, I was not optimistic about gaining access to schematics or the mask artwork that was used to create the original 4004 wafers, and so I began devising a "Plan B." I was even starting to wonder if there were any schematics to be found, having read interviews that suggested that no complete logic diagram was ever drawn of the 4004. In consultation with Federico Faggin and MIT's Tom Knight, I mentally prepared myself for reverse-engineering the 4004 "the old-fashioned way," by photographing the metal layer through a microscope, and then etching that top layer away to reveal the polysilicon layer, photographing that, and using enlargements of these photomicrographs to meticulously transcribe every transistor and wire.
A few weeks later I got word from Tracey Mazur that Intel's legal department would allow us access to the 4004 engineering documents, and Rachel Stewart was offering encouraging news about her research.
In late July of 2005 I flew to California to meet with Federico Faggin and Rachel Stewart at the Intel archives. The visit was amazingly brief and nearly a complete success. Faggin picked up three large engineering drawings on vullum, a translucent plastic sheeting, unrolled them one-by-one, and declared within 30 seconds, "Yes. This is all of them." Rachel and I looked at each other approvingly, as Faggin adds, "See here? The drawings are drawn just like the chip layout."
The Calculator connection
Reverse Engineering the schematics
Meanwhile I continued to develop the ROM reader, periodically sending Brian and Barry my results to see if the binary data I was extracting yielded valid 4004 code. After some struggles with the unusual voltage levels used by the 4001 ROMs, we succeeded in extracting a significant fraction of the Busicom software from the ROMs Faggin had found in his basement. The bad news was that there were large strings of zeros in three out of four of the calculator ROMs. We would have to find another source.
Digital Archeology Expedition
After Fred returned to Boston, I immediately sent the ROM contents to Brian and Barry, who used Fred's wiring diagram along with printed circuit board photographs I received from Christian Bassow, a German chip collector. Within a month, they had crafted an instruction-level simulator of the 4004 as well as simulated Busicom hardware, and by January 2006, they had a completely working simulation of the Busicom 141-PF printing calculator.
Verilog simulation of the 4004
Funding and Exhibit design
Letting visitors "look under the hood"
Exhibit Detail and Construction
Out of the vaults and into the world
Concurrently with the exhibit contruction, I started having conversations with Tracey behind the scenes to see if we could get Intel to release the 4004 schematics, mask works, and MCS-4 Users Manual into the public domain. After all, what is the point of keeping historic technology locked up in a vault once its only value is historical? At this writing, Intel has agreed to license these documents for non-commercial use.
- Intel is a registered trade mark of the Intel Corporation
- This web site is in no way affiliated with the Intel Corporation
- The opinions and statements expressed are my own.
- The software (e.g. simulator) and engineering documents (e.g. schematics) are provided "AS IS" with no warranty expressed or implied. Fitness for any particular purpose is not guaranteed. The authors do not accept any liability for use of this information.
- The works on this web site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.